I basically agree on this, but I think we should state such a restriction on X in Section 2.1.2. I tried to make some tweak to Section 2, which is attached below. Could you check if I misunderstand anything? (See attached file: 20020308.html) Thanks, Takeshi IMAMURA Tokyo Research Laboratory IBM Research imamu@jp.ibm.com From: Joseph Reagle <reagle@w3.org>@w3.org on 2002/03/08 06:45 Please respond to reagle@w3.org Sent by: xml-encryption-request@w3.org To: merlin <merlin@baltimore.ie> cc: Takeshi Imamura/Japan/IBM@IBMJP, Hiroshi Maruyama/Japan/IBM@IBMJP, xml-encryption@w3.org Subject: Re: Why is Except limited to local fragments? Ok, now: 3. If there is a single e that is the root element of X , that is not referenced by any dcrpt:Except elements in R, and its Type attribute is absent or otherwise indicates octets: 1. Let Y' be decryptOctets(X, e). 2. Return Y
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 27 May 2007 00:09:00 GMT