W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-encryption@w3.org > March 2002

Re: Why is Except limited to local fragments?

From: Takeshi Imamura <IMAMU@jp.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 17:03:58 +0900
To: reagle@w3.org, merlin <merlin@baltimore.ie>
Cc: "Hiroshi Maruyama" <MARUYAMA@jp.ibm.com>, xml-encryption@w3.org
Message-ID: <OF28DB7C87.CCD01371-ON49256B76.002B33D8@LocalDomain>

I basically agree on this, but I think we should state such a restriction
on X in Section 2.1.2.  I tried to make some tweak to Section 2, which is
attached below.  Could you check if I misunderstand anything?

(See attached file: 20020308.html)

Tokyo Research Laboratory
IBM Research

From: Joseph Reagle <reagle@w3.org>@w3.org on 2002/03/08 06:45

Please respond to reagle@w3.org

Sent by:  xml-encryption-request@w3.org

To:   merlin <merlin@baltimore.ie>
cc:   Takeshi Imamura/Japan/IBM@IBMJP, Hiroshi Maruyama/Japan/IBM@IBMJP,
Subject:  Re: Why is Except limited to local fragments?

Ok, now:

3.  If there is a single e that is the root element of X , that is not
referenced by any dcrpt:Except elements in R, and its Type attribute is
absent or otherwise indicates octets:

1. Let Y' be decryptOctets(X, e).
2. Return Y

Received on Friday, 8 March 2002 03:04:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:32:03 UTC