W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-encryption@w3.org > June 2002

Re: Decryption Transform processing question

From: Takeshi Imamura <IMAMU@jp.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2002 13:28:17 +0900
To: reagle@w3.org
Cc: xml-encryption@w3.org
Message-ID: <OF2BB2EF13.6AC241EA-ON49256BDB.00162F06@LocalDomain>


>> >Why is that dependent on super-decryption? I thought this would be
>> > useful independent of that issue?
>>
>> Because, if super-decryption is supported, there can be a case where
both
>> decryptions are combined.  For example, one may super-encrypt an
>> EncryptedData element which results from encrypting binary data.
>
>Yes, I suppose it is needed when there is super-decryption. My point was
>that it might be useful without it as well.

As I asked you in another mail, I'm not sure what is the merit in
supporting XML decryption and binary decryption as well.  Supporting them
in addition to their combined decryption seems to be redundant.  However,
if there are any requirements, we might support them.

Thanks,
Takeshi IMAMURA
Tokyo Research Laboratory
IBM Research
imamu@jp.ibm.com
Received on Monday, 17 June 2002 00:52:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:32:04 UTC