Re: Decryption Transform processing question

Joseph,

>> I don't think that using an explicit Type attribute value is a good
>> proposal.  It is not an encryptor but a signer that decides whether an
>> EncryptedData element should be decrypted.
>
>Instead of a type, how about a specific parameter (e.g., &decrypt;#super)

Who specifies the parameter and where does he/she specify it?

>(BTW: Do you accept the proposal that we support &decypt;bnary and
>&decrypt;XML?)

If we don't support super-decryption, I accept the proposal.

Thanks,
Takeshi IMAMURA
Tokyo Research Laboratory
IBM Research
imamu@jp.ibm.com