Re: Decryption Transform processing question

On Tuesday 04 June 2002 11:58 am, Takeshi Imamura wrote:
> I don't think that using an explicit Type attribute value is a good
> proposal.  It is not an encryptor but a signer that decides whether an
> EncryptedData element should be decrypted.  

Instead of a type, how about a specific parameter (e.g., &decrypt;#super) 
(BTW: Do you accept the proposal that we support &decypt;bnary and 
&decrypt;XML?)

Received on Thursday, 6 June 2002 13:21:56 UTC