W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-encryption@w3.org > January 2002

Re: Last call comments on XML Encryption specs

From: Joseph Reagle <reagle@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 13:43:57 -0500
Message-Id: <200201231844.NAA02835@tux.w3.org>
To: Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>, dee3@torque.pothole.com
Cc: xml-encryption@w3.org
Well, as we don't even use URL or URN in this spec, I removed the refs.

On Wednesday 23 January 2002 06:35, Martin Duerst wrote:
> >We also cite URI/URN, and I don't think any draft has superceded RFC1738
> > in whole.
>
> What parts of RFC 1738 do you think are not covered in RFC 2396?
> It could be that there are some individual URI schemes described
> in RFC 1738 that haven't been described yet in any new RFC, but
> you don't need a reference to particular URI schemes.

-- 

Joseph Reagle Jr.                 http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/
W3C Policy Analyst                mailto:reagle@w3.org
IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair   http://www.w3.org/Signature/
W3C XML Encryption Chair          http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/
Received on Wednesday, 23 January 2002 13:44:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:32:02 UTC