W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-encryption@w3.org > January 2002

Re: content type decryption clarification?

From: Joseph Reagle <reagle@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 10:15:50 -0500
Message-Id: <200201111516.KAA02226@tux.w3.org>
To: <hirsch@zolera.com>, <xml-encryption@w3.org>
Frederick,

I too have a sense that the text isn't quite right, but I was hoping folks 
would check me on it in this thread:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-encryption/2002Jan/0023.html

See Christian's original email:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-encryption/2002Jan/0017.html

On Friday 11 January 2002 10:17, Frederick Hirsch wrote:
> In the editors draft the section on encryption processing rules (4.1,
> item 5) states
>
> . ( Note: If the Type is "content" the plaintext resulting from
> decryption may not be well formed if the EncryptedData element was (a)
> the root element of a document, or (b) has other siblings (e.g. PIs and
> text nodes).)
>
>
> I understand the first case - decrypting the EncryptedData element will
> result in a document without a root element, which is not well-formed.
>
> I do not understand the second case. In the case of having text nodes,
> this implies the EncryptedData element was the child of an element, when
> decrypted there would be two text node children of that element, which is
> legal isn't it? What am I missing here?
>
> thanks
>
>
> ---
> Frederick Hirsch
> Zolera Systems, http://www.zolera.com/
> Information Integrity, XML Security

-- 

Joseph Reagle Jr.                 http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/
W3C Policy Analyst                mailto:reagle@w3.org
IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair   http://www.w3.org/Signature/
W3C XML Encryption Chair          http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/
Received on Friday, 11 January 2002 10:16:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:32:02 UTC