At 15:00 02/08/08 -0400, Joseph Reagle wrote: >As Ned and Martin point out, the intent is to express the fact that >"application/xenc+xml" is XML, and consequently shares the same charset and >encoding semantics/processing as that defined in RFC 3023. Well, what the spec currently writes is okay, but what you just write above is not: The intent is to say that application/xenc+xml shares the same charset behaviour as application/xml defined in RFC 3023. (text/xml behaves differently) Regards, Martin.Received on Friday, 9 August 2002 23:42:11 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:42:21 GMT