W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-encryption@w3.org > April 2002

Re: Decryption Transform processing question

From: Ari Kermaier <arik@phaos.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 11:59:00 -0400
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20020426115007.0232a690@verio.phaos.com>
To: "Takeshi Imamura" <IMAMU@jp.ibm.com>
Cc: xml-encryption@w3.org
At 04:24 PM 4/26/02 +0900, Takeshi Imamura wrote:

<snip/>

>By the way, as to decryptXML(), it may be necessary to exchange step 2 and
>3 because an octet stream obtained in step 1 may not contain any namespace
>declaration attribute necessary for parsing the octet stream when
>decrypting an EncrypteData element within the octet stream.  How do you
>feel?

I'm not sure I understand. Isn't the parsing context C that would be used 
in step 3 itself derived entirely from node-set X? If that's the case, 
what's an example of a namespace declaration that would be in C but would 
not be preserved by applying XML-C14N to X?


Ari Kermaier    arik@phaos.com
Senior Software Engineer
Phaos Technology Corp.    http://www.phaos.com/
Received on Friday, 26 April 2002 11:56:32 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:42:21 GMT