- From: Joseph Reagle <reagle@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 17:27:48 -0500
- To: "Takeshi Imamura" <IMAMU@jp.ibm.com>
- Cc: "Hiroshi Maruyama" <MARUYAMA@jp.ibm.com>, "Kento Tamura" <TKENT@jp.ibm.com>, xml-encryption@w3.org
[ http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/Drafts/xmlenc-decrypt $Revision: 1.9 $ on $Date: 2001/10/31 22:26:23 $ GMT by $Author: reagle $ ] Ok, I've had another go at re-organizing the processing rules and add some explanatory text. Please let me know if it's ok. On Monday 01 October 2001 9:23, Takeshi Imamura wrote: > >Could you remind me why we need to do the serialization and dummy node > >wrapping again? (We'll need some text for the spec, because if I'm still > >getting confused as to why we need to do all these serializations and > >parsing others will wonder too!) > > > >With respect to importation... I suppose I could remove the node e. > > Decrypt > > >the node e. Now I have octets representing the UTF-8 encoding of XML > >characters. You're saying XPath doesn't tell us how to re-insert this? > > Yes. So we decided to replace a given node-set totally with another > newly created node-set. To do this, the given node-set has to be > serialized as a whole, decrypt-and-replaced, and then parsed. -- * I will be in France from 3-9 November for the W3C AC Meeting. Joseph Reagle Jr. http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/ W3C Policy Analyst mailto:reagle@w3.org IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair http://www.w3.org/Signature/ W3C XML Encryption Chair http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/
Received on Wednesday, 31 October 2001 17:27:53 UTC