W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-encryption@w3.org > October 2001

Re: spec comments

From: Joseph Reagle <reagle@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 15:36:37 -0400
To: "Donald E. Eastlake 3rd" <lde008@dma.isg.mot.com>
Cc: merlin <merlin@baltimore.ie>, xenc <xml-encryption@w3.org>
Message-Id: <20011024193637.B9932877A8@policy.w3.org>
Moved from 
  <element name="DigestMethod" type="ds:DigestMethodType">
to 
  <element ref="ds:DigestMethod">

(I also noted that the schema of the AgreementMethod schema in the spec had 
some typos, which are now fixed.)

[ Resulting document
  http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/Drafts/xmlenc-core/
  $Revision: 1.67 $ on $Date: 2001/10/24 19:32:42 $ GMT by $Author: reagle $
]

On Wednesday 17 October 2001 11:31, Donald E. Eastlake 3rd wrote:
> Fine on always using "ref=" for DigestMethod.
>
> DigestMethod is required for Diffie-Hellman as we have defined it but
> there could be other AgreementMethod Algorithms that do not need a
> DigestMethod parameter. Some text saying this would be OK but I think
> this comment is left over from when the method of deriving the Keying
> Material from the agreed shared secret was global and always needed a
> DigestMethod. Now that it is just linked to Diffie-Hellman, the spec
> is right.
>
> >At 10:06 7/27/2001, merlin wrote:
> >>In some places, we use <element ref="ds:DigestMethod"> and in others,
> >><element name="DigestMethod" type="ds:DigestMethodType">. Should we
> >>just adopt the former (as is the case with our use of unadulterated
> >>KeyInfo) or is there an intended distinction?

-- 
Joseph Reagle Jr.                 http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/
W3C Policy Analyst                mailto:reagle@w3.org
IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair   http://www.w3.org/Signature/
W3C XML Encryption Chair          http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/
Received on Wednesday, 24 October 2001 15:37:42 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:42:19 GMT