RE: An issue and a typo in Decryption Transform Oct 18th draft

I agree - I didn't think of the simple solution below - sorry! I think
it may be useful to include a few words on this in the security
consideration section. Amir

> > However, there is another solution: do not _sign_ the 
> encrypted data in
> > the first place. Namely, the transform could have a third operation
> > which completely removes encrypted-then-signed elements, 
> 
> This is possible and achievable within the framework of 
> xmldsig itself. One 
> could write an XPath expression that removed the encrypted 
> portions one 
> does not want to sign.