W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-encryption@w3.org > November 2001

Re: Decryption Transform comments

From: Joseph Reagle <reagle@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 17:17:49 -0500
To: "Takeshi Imamura" <IMAMU@jp.ibm.com>
Cc: <hirsch@zolera.com>, <xml-encryption@w3.org>, "Hiroshi Maruyama" <MARUYAMA@jp.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20011115221750.19DD422AD@policy.w3.org>
[ Result:
  $Revision: 1.13 $ on $Date: 2001/11/15 22:14:59 $ GMT by $Author: reagle $

I think we're good for publication except for the two small questions 
(about "e" and "entity") I have about the parsing context.

o Prefix and namespace name of each namespace that is in scope for e, the 
first element node in X. [is this e different than that in 
decryptIncludedNodes? -JR]
o Name and value of each entity [is this the formal definion of entity from 
xml1.0 or something else -JR] that is effective for the XML document 
causing X.

On Friday 02 November 2001 12:18, Takeshi Imamura wrote:
> You missed Frederick's tweak about XPointer.


> Also I think that the third item in Section 2.1.2 is not a restriction
> but just a note for the function decrypt().  So it should be moved to the
> definition of the function.


> OK, I try revising the description of the function "noDecryptNodes" as
> follows:



Joseph Reagle Jr.                 http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/
W3C Policy Analyst                mailto:reagle@w3.org
IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair   http://www.w3.org/Signature/
W3C XML Encryption Chair          http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/
Received on Thursday, 15 November 2001 17:17:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:32:02 UTC