W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-encryption@w3.org > May 2001

Proposal: Moving DataModel to XML1.0

From: Joseph M. Reagle Jr. <reagle@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 16:20:53 -0400
Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20010518161640.00b1e120@localhost>
To: "XML Encryption WG " <xml-encryption@w3.org>
After speaking to Dan Connolly about some of the issue (and walking through 
the processing) I've done some edits [1] to tweak some of the encoding 
issues (including what to do if the parent document isn't in UTF-8) and 
realized if all where doing is character/octet processing (and everything 
else is implementation/application) we have a better spec than DOM and 
Infoset even, the XML1.0 spec! <smile> Let me know what you think.

(Also, the fact that I'm continuing to distinguish between element and its 
content is not an argument that we need to persist, but it's still my 
preference.)

[1] http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/05/11-proposal.html
$Revision: 1.6 $ on $Date: 2001/05/18 20:14:29 $

--
Joseph Reagle Jr.                 http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/
W3C Policy Analyst                mailto:reagle@w3.org
IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair   http://www.w3.org/Signature
W3C XML Encryption Chair          http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/
Received on Friday, 18 May 2001 16:20:54 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:42:19 GMT