- From: Joseph M. Reagle Jr. <reagle@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 16:20:53 -0400
- To: "XML Encryption WG " <xml-encryption@w3.org>
After speaking to Dan Connolly about some of the issue (and walking through the processing) I've done some edits [1] to tweak some of the encoding issues (including what to do if the parent document isn't in UTF-8) and realized if all where doing is character/octet processing (and everything else is implementation/application) we have a better spec than DOM and Infoset even, the XML1.0 spec! <smile> Let me know what you think. (Also, the fact that I'm continuing to distinguish between element and its content is not an argument that we need to persist, but it's still my preference.) [1] http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/05/11-proposal.html $Revision: 1.6 $ on $Date: 2001/05/18 20:14:29 $ -- Joseph Reagle Jr. http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/ W3C Policy Analyst mailto:reagle@w3.org IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair http://www.w3.org/Signature W3C XML Encryption Chair http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/
Received on Friday, 18 May 2001 16:20:54 UTC