Re: XML Encryption Data/Processing Model

>    * Serialization: We would need to define a serialization for the
>      Information Set. Richard Tobin has worked on a proposal for
>      serializing a post-schema-validated Infoset. Or (since the serialization
>      isn't as sensitive as it was in signature which requires all
> serialization
>      of the same instance to be bit-by-bit identical) we might be able to
> leave
>      this up to applications.

Would this mean that XMLEnc depends and/or requires Schema?  That would
be a very bad thing.
	/r$