W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-encryption@w3.org > March 2001

Re: XML Encryption Data/Processing Model

From: Rich Salz <rsalz@zolera.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 21:10:21 -0500
Message-ID: <3AC1480D.1E003036@zolera.com>
To: "Joseph M. Reagle Jr." <reagle@w3.org>
CC: XML Encryption WG <xml-encryption@w3.org>
>    * Serialization: We would need to define a serialization for the
>      Information Set. Richard Tobin has worked on a proposal for
>      serializing a post-schema-validated Infoset. Or (since the serialization
>      isn't as sensitive as it was in signature which requires all
> serialization
>      of the same instance to be bit-by-bit identical) we might be able to
> leave
>      this up to applications.

Would this mean that XMLEnc depends and/or requires Schema?  That would
be a very bad thing.
	/r$
Received on Tuesday, 27 March 2001 21:07:43 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:42:18 GMT