At 12:13 6/11/2001, Donald E. Eastlake 3rd wrote: >Although I think the specification ends up being more or less correct, >I think its approach is unnecessarily confusing. I think that XML Ok, it has a little bit of Ed, Don, and Joseph in it <smile/>, could still use tweaks still I'm sure. [ http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/05/11-proposal.html#sec-CipherReference $Revision: 1.16 $ on $Date: 2001/06/11 21:53:56 $ by $Author:reagle $ ] -- Joseph Reagle Jr. http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/ W3C Policy Analyst mailto:reagle@w3.org IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair http://www.w3.org/Signature W3C XML Encryption Chair http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/Received on Monday, 11 June 2001 17:55:25 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:42:19 GMT