- From: Donald E. Eastlake 3rd <dee3@torque.pothole.com>
- Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2001 22:25:10 -0400
- To: Takeshi Imamura <imamu@jp.ibm.com>, Hiroshi Maruyama <maruyama@jp.ibm.com>, "XML Encryption WG " <xml-encryption@w3.org>
While I think this transform does the right thing, I get the feeling there is an aweful lot of bouncing back and forth between octets and node sets.... Donald From: "Joseph M. Reagle Jr." <reagle@w3.org> Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20010521130714.02fe3680@localhost> Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 13:10:09 -0400 To: Takeshi Imamura <imamu@jp.ibm.com>, Hiroshi Maruyama <maruyama@jp.ibm.com> Cc: "XML Encryption WG " <xml-encryption@w3.org> >I've posted your proposal at [1] with a few editorial tweaks (mostly in the >Security Considerations). People should read and comment, but barring any >substantive opposition by May 29, I'll move it forward as a W3C Working Draft. > > > >[1] http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/05/10-decryption-transform.html > >-- >Joseph Reagle Jr. http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/ >W3C Policy Analyst mailto:reagle@w3.org >IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair http://www.w3.org/Signature >W3C XML Encryption Chair http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/
Received on Wednesday, 6 June 2001 22:26:07 UTC