Re: Decryption Transform for XML Signature

While I think this transform does the right thing, I get the feeling
there is an aweful lot of bouncing back and forth between octets
and node sets....

Donald

From:  "Joseph M. Reagle Jr." <reagle@w3.org>
Message-Id:  <4.3.2.7.2.20010521130714.02fe3680@localhost>
Date:  Mon, 21 May 2001 13:10:09 -0400
To:  Takeshi Imamura <imamu@jp.ibm.com>, Hiroshi Maruyama <maruyama@jp.ibm.com>
Cc:  "XML Encryption WG " <xml-encryption@w3.org>

>I've posted your proposal at [1] with a few editorial tweaks (mostly in the 
>Security Considerations). People should read and comment, but barring any 
>substantive opposition by May 29, I'll move it forward as a W3C Working Draft.
>
>
>
>[1] http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/05/10-decryption-transform.html
>
>--
>Joseph Reagle Jr.                 http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/
>W3C Policy Analyst                mailto:reagle@w3.org
>IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair   http://www.w3.org/Signature
>W3C XML Encryption Chair          http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/