W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-encryption@w3.org > June 2001

Re: CipherData rationale

From: Joseph M. Reagle Jr. <reagle@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2001 17:41:41 -0400
Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20010604174037.02a8a130@localhost>
To: "Takeshi Imamura" <IMAMU@jp.ibm.com>
Cc: "Frederick J. Hirsch" <hirsch@zolera.com>, <xml-encryption@w3.org>
At 03:18 5/30/2001, Takeshi Imamura wrote:
>By the way, in your example, you specify C14N as a transform, but C14N is
>not reversible and cannot be specified.

BTW: Since we have a different behaviour for our transforms, should we *not* 
use the ds:Transforms element as we presently do? Should we define an 
enc:Transforms (of ds:TransformsType ?) to make this clear?


--
Joseph Reagle Jr.                 http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/
W3C Policy Analyst                mailto:reagle@w3.org
IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair   http://www.w3.org/Signature
W3C XML Encryption Chair          http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/
Received on Monday, 4 June 2001 17:42:12 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:42:19 GMT