Re: CipherData rationale

At 03:18 5/30/2001, Takeshi Imamura wrote:
>By the way, in your example, you specify C14N as a transform, but C14N is
>not reversible and cannot be specified.

BTW: Since we have a different behaviour for our transforms, should we *not* 
use the ds:Transforms element as we presently do? Should we define an 
enc:Transforms (of ds:TransformsType ?) to make this clear?


--
Joseph Reagle Jr.                 http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/
W3C Policy Analyst                mailto:reagle@w3.org
IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair   http://www.w3.org/Signature
W3C XML Encryption Chair          http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/

Received on Monday, 4 June 2001 17:42:12 UTC