W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-encryption@w3.org > July 2001


From: Chng Bee Tiong <zmzmz@singnet.com.sg>
Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2001 06:07:06 +0800
Message-ID: <003c01c11a0d$277f0f60$86d615a5@isc80281>
To: "XML Encryption WG" <xml-encryption@w3.org>
On Revision 1.29:

1. Why is AES-192 optional? aes-alg-00.txt states so, but I notice that it remains an open issue in aes-alg-02.txt?

2. Referring to 3.4.3, why "<<same-document>> RetrievalMethod references"?

3. 6.1.1 and 6.1.2 is considering the case of "sign, then encrypt", right? 
Is anything being done for "encrypt, then sign"? Or is there no problem at all? 
I'm a bit lost in reading through all those previous discussions...

4. Referring to 2.1.5, why MUST encrypt <<whole>> EncryptedData and EncryptedKey and not allowed for parts?

Sorry if the above questions seem obvious... :-)
Received on Tuesday, 31 July 2001 18:07:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:32:00 UTC