W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-encryption@w3.org > July 2001

RE: "Replace and encrypt will be Recommended (optional)."

From: Joseph M. Reagle Jr. <reagle@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2001 16:47:51 -0400
Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20010731164621.02dc3ee8@localhost>
To: "Takeshi Imamura" <IMAMU@jp.ibm.com>
Cc: edsimon@xmlsec.com, XML Encryption WG <xml-encryption@w3.org>, Blair Dillaway <blaird@microsoft.com>
At 10:27 7/31/2001, Takeshi Imamura wrote:
> >When doing a replace on decrypt, same thing, octets or nodes?
>
>I think that when doing a replacement, something may be returned for
>application's convenience, e.g., as a DOM node, but it does not have to be
>required.

So we should say "... if the Type is "Element" or "Content", then:
1. provide the octets, or
2. provide the nodeset, or
3. replace
"
?

>Do you mean that both are required to implement and whether doing a
>replacement or not depends on application's choice?  If so, I agree with
>you.

Yes, I mean whatever set of options we come up, they should all be required 
to implement.


--
Joseph Reagle Jr.                 http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/
W3C Policy Analyst                mailto:reagle@w3.org
IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair   http://www.w3.org/Signature
W3C XML Encryption Chair          http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/
Received on Tuesday, 31 July 2001 16:48:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:32:00 UTC