W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-encryption@w3.org > July 2001

RE: Fwd: Surreptitious Forwarding

From: Mike Just <Mike.Just@entrust.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2001 09:33:52 -0400
Message-ID: <9A4F653B0A375841AC75A8D17712B9C980F333@sottmxs04.entrust.com>
To: "'Don Davis'" <dtd@world.std.com>
Cc: XML Encryption WG <xml-encryption@w3.org>, SMathews@conclusive.com, "Joseph M. Reagle Jr." <reagle@w3.org>
Hi Don,

> my text is not too specific for XML-Sig, unless mine were to
> be that document's only caution against misuse of signatures.
> i agree that for either document, my text is not by itself a
> sufficient caution.  each document should also include the
> other, more axiomatic warnings, as appropriate. for example,
> as you say, joseph's original text ("...not signed but part
> of an envelope...", quoted above) should of course be included
> as a separate bullet-item, so that it won't be confused with
> my point about signed-&-encrypted messages.
> 
> thank you for your comments.
> 
> 					- don davis, boston
> 

I had noticed your axiomatic separation, but apparently forgot when I read
your proposed text. I misread your intent as wanting to only have the
signature-and-encryption warning. I agree with what you state above. 

Cheers,
Mike
Received on Tuesday, 31 July 2001 09:34:24 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:42:19 GMT