W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-encryption@w3.org > July 2001

Re: XML Encryption spec

From: Joseph M. Reagle Jr. <reagle@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2001 16:02:25 -0400
Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20010727160205.02ec5b88@localhost>
To: Shivaram Mysore <Shivaram.Mysore@Sun.COM>
Cc: xml-encryption@w3.org, hugo@w3.org
At 16:02 7/25/2001, Shivaram Mysore wrote:
>I think it is a wise idea to change our prefix to "xenc" from just "enc" .
>Encoding is more common and most people are familiar with and having just 
>"enc"
>for encoding makes sense.  but, it looks like we need something like xenc 
>(for
>lack of a better alternative)

Ok, now reflected in:
         http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/Drafts/xmlenc-core/
         $Revision: 1.28 $ on $Date: 2001/07/27 19:43:08 $


--
Joseph Reagle Jr.                 http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/
W3C Policy Analyst                mailto:reagle@w3.org
IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair   http://www.w3.org/Signature
W3C XML Encryption Chair          http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/
Received on Friday, 27 July 2001 16:02:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:32:00 UTC