W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-encryption@w3.org > July 2001

Re: spec comments

From: merlin <merlin@baltimore.ie>
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2001 15:11:43 +0100
To: xml-encryption@w3.org
Message-Id: <20010727141143.728F943BCB@yog-sothoth.ie.baltimore.com>
r/merlin@baltimore.ie/2001.07.27/15:06:34
>In the workshop, did we say something about whitespace handling in
>the agreement method Nonce element? Do we strip just surrounding
>whitespace or also internal whitespace, or should we do none?

Gears turn; didn't we agree that it should be be ds:CryptoBinary?

Merlin


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Baltimore Technologies plc will not be liable for direct,  special,  indirect 
or consequential  damages  arising  from  alteration of  the contents of this
message by a third party or as a result of any virus being passed on.

In addition, certain Marketing collateral may be added from time to time to
promote Baltimore Technologies products, services, Global e-Security or
appearance at trade shows and conferences.

This footnote confirms that this email message has been swept by
Baltimore MIMEsweeper for Content Security threats, including
computer viruses.
   http://www.baltimore.com
Received on Friday, 27 July 2001 10:12:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:32:00 UTC