W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-encryption@w3.org > July 2001

Re: XML Encryption spec

From: Joseph M. Reagle Jr. <reagle@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 15:46:07 -0400
Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20010725151407.02cc1390@localhost>
To: "Takeshi Imamura" <IMAMU@jp.ibm.com>
Cc: "Frederick J. Hirsch" <hirsch@zolera.com>, <xml-encryption@w3.org>, Hugo Haas <hugo@w3.org>
[
http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/Drafts/xmlenc-core/
$Revision: 1.26 $ on $Date: 2001/07/25 19:41:23 $
]

The resulting document should reflect these changes and my acition items 
from the meeting (including change to #tripdes).

BTW: I've noticed that the SOAP spec is using the 'enc:' prefix for 
encoding? Should we shift to xenc so as to prevent confusion? (I know these 
are only prefixes, but they still have a big affect on human readibility.)

At 07:21 7/25/2001, Takeshi Imamura wrote:
>Section 3.2.1
>The type of the <Transforms> element would not be ds:TransformsType but
>enc:TransformsType.



--
Joseph Reagle Jr.                 http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/
W3C Policy Analyst                mailto:reagle@w3.org
IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair   http://www.w3.org/Signature
W3C XML Encryption Chair          http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/
Received on Wednesday, 25 July 2001 15:46:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:32:00 UTC