W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-encryption@w3.org > July 2001

CANCELLED Call 13:00 EST July 9th

From: Joseph M. Reagle Jr. <reagle@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2001 18:47:18 -0400
Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20010705184107.00b95e98@localhost>
To: "XML Encryption WG " <xml-encryption@w3.org>

I'm going to cancel the call on Monday given we don't have that much to 
discuss. That's not to say there's nothing to discuss, but these issues 
merit some more discussion on the list before we need to discuss them on a 
teleconf I think -- and their fairly minor to boot.

In other news our WD was published and I'm agitating others to review the 
spec by July 13th so we have question/comments/issues to address at the FTF 
then move through a formal call very quickly. Then the task is 
implementation experience -- particular on the decrypt transform! However, 
one of the rules of this process seems folks don't review your spec until 
it's too late <grin/>, so if you know of some constituency that should have 
a look, please ask them to look at the spec! (I've asked most of the 
relevant W3C WGs and the Oasis SS TC (SAML)).

Proposal: Dropping the Type algorithm for a given key.
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-encryption/2001Jul/0009.html

Proposal: Nonce attribute.
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-encryption/2001Jul/0004.html

Requirement to Warn of Surreptitious Forwarding
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-encryption/2001Jun/0100.html

--
Joseph Reagle Jr.                 http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/
W3C Policy Analyst                mailto:reagle@w3.org
IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair   http://www.w3.org/Signature
W3C XML Encryption Chair          http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/
Received on Thursday, 5 July 2001 18:47:19 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:32:00 UTC