W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-encryption@w3.org > January 2001

RE: Signing and Encryption

From: Joseph M. Reagle Jr. <reagle@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2001 18:16:51 -0500
Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20010123181217.02a71018@rpcp.mit.edu>
To: Philip Hallam-Baker <pbaker@verisign.com>
Cc: "'Yongge Wang'" <ywang@certicom.com>, xml-encryption@w3.org
At 09:01 1/23/2001 -0800, Philip Hallam-Baker wrote:
>Maybe what this is pointing to is that the model of separating signing and
>encryption might not be as neat as people thought... We may need an element
><crypto> as container for all the signature and encryption data.

What would the contents be? A list (stack) of references to Encryption and 
Signature elements? If you add a signature or encryption, push; if you 
remove one, pop? Two issues:

1. order might not always be important (if I encrypt two sibling element 
seperately order isn't important, but won't hurt anything unless this 
deprives the application of some functionality...)
2. this information will probably then want to be signed or encrypted, we 
fold back in on ourselves and things are quite complex...?

__
Joseph Reagle Jr.
W3C Policy Analyst                mailto:reagle@w3.org
IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair   http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/
Received on Tuesday, 23 January 2001 18:17:48 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:42:18 GMT