- From: Rich Salz <rsalz@zolera.com>
- Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 16:47:26 -0400
- To: reagle@w3.org
- CC: XML Encryption WG <xml-encryption@w3.org>
> I suppose one could ... but why? I'm following conventions used in xmldsig > that were used elsewhere and that haven't had any problems with yet [1]. Hmm, the SOAP folks split up things into two namespaces xsi (instance) and xsd (datatype), and I always just assumed you had to do things that way. I can see one advantage: I can import XENC without getting complexType also defined. That might be compelling. /r$ -- Zolera Systems, Your Key to Online Integrity Securing Web services: XML, SOAP, Dig-sig, Encryption http://www.zolera.com
Received on Monday, 27 August 2001 16:47:14 UTC