- From: Takeshi Imamura <IMAMU@jp.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2001 00:56:58 +0900
- To: edsimon@xmlsec.com
- Cc: "Joseph M. Reagle Jr." <reagle@w3.org>, XML Encryption WG <xml-encryption@w3.org>, Blair Dillaway <blaird@microsoft.com>
Ed, >My gut reaction is forget about octet handling (for XML data only, steps >1 and 2) unless we hear that there is a need for it. If applications need >the octets for XML data, they can serialize a returned nodeset. > >I'd be glad to hear of reasonable scenarios where octet handling (for XML >data) is deemed valuable. Otherwise, I'll probably just stick with my gut >reaction. If the processing rules are defined on the basis of nodeset (infoset?), they will fit in with the existing "decryption transform" well, and so I like them. But also how to parse a decrypted XML fragment into a nodeset has to be defined and it may need a lot of effort... Thanks, Takeshi IMAMURA Tokyo Research Laboratory IBM Research imamu@jp.ibm.com
Received on Monday, 6 August 2001 11:57:45 UTC