W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-encryption@w3.org > November 2000

Re: Data Model

From: Takeshi Imamura <IMAMU@jp.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2000 11:26:05 +0900
To: "Joseph M. Reagle Jr." <reagle@w3.org>
Cc: xml-encryption@w3.org, "Hiroshi Maruyama" <MARUYAMA@jp.ibm.com>
Message-ID: <OF3FB47299.0F78E8B4-ON49256990.000A6D29@LocalDomain>


Joseph,

I mean by the sentence that there will exist some data models (e.g.,
information set) suitable for XML encryption and satisfying our design
assumptions, and we should discuss which one is best.  Does this make
sense?

Thanks,
Takeshi IMAMURA
Tokyo Research Laboratory
IBM Research
E-mail: imamu@jp.ibm.com



From: "Joseph M. Reagle Jr." <reagle@w3.org>@w3.org on 2000/11/07 08:37 AM

Please respond to "Joseph M. Reagle Jr." <reagle@w3.org>

Sent by:  xml-encryption-request@w3.org


To:   Hiroshi Maruyama/Japan/IBM@IBMJP
cc:   "Public XML Encryption List" <xml-encryption@w3.org>
Subject:  Data Model



Hiroshi,

in my minutes I think I copied something from your slides that stated:
"Hiroshi: "What data model is suitable for XML Encryption and
<EncryptionInfo> and which should be adopted?"

What did you mean by this?

__
Joseph Reagle Jr.
W3C Policy Analyst                mailto:reagle@w3.org
IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair   http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/
Received on Monday, 6 November 2000 21:26:21 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:42:18 GMT