W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-editor@w3.org > October to December 2008

Re: Quick observation

From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2008 16:58:26 +0100
To: Joe Kesselman <keshlam@alum.mit.edu>
Cc: xml-editor@w3.org, keshlam-nospam@comcast.net
Message-ID: <f5br670i9y5.fsf@hildegard.inf.ed.ac.uk>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Joe Kesselman writes:

> It seems we've gotten out of the habit of including a rationalle
> section for errata entries. May I suggest that someone go back and add
> one to E09 and later?

Thanks for the suggestion, don't know why we slipped up on that,
rationales now supplied for E09, E10 and E11 - - see

 http://www.w3.org/XML/xml-V10-4e-errata.html

ht
- -- 
       Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh
                         Half-time member of W3C Team
      10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
                Fax: (44) 131 651-1426, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
                       URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFI454ikjnJixAXWBoRAglwAJ0SaYT7j9WQVNNrbEf29ptD97p3CACfcfb9
PQd629w3W8Mj/mCRSOz3lYY=
=9vOE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Wednesday, 1 October 2008 16:00:12 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:40 GMT