W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-editor@w3.org > January to March 2008

XML 1.0 5th edition

From: James Abley <james.abley@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 00:22:35 +0000
Message-ID: <23fce8e60802091622x17f96c30i193a51e7c0a8c4a@mail.gmail.com>
To: xml-editor@w3.org


You can't change the definition of an XML Name like that and still
call it XML 1.0. Or is this what one gets for relying on the
definition of a Name to be fixed and using it throughout various
applications, only to wake up and find that the definition has
changed. Do I then put notes in user documentation that it only
supports XML Names from XML 1.0 4th edition or earlier?

It's a good change, switching from a whitelist to a blacklist for
codepoints, but call it what it is guys, and bump the version number.


Received on Sunday, 10 February 2008 17:32:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:37:46 UTC