Yes, that's correct; ext is still a plain old internal entity. There are a number of places where declarations can occur and a number of indirections possible; regardless of the location, an internal entity declaration retains its essential nature. Eve Junfeng Dong wrote: > Hi Eve, > > Thanks for your reply. Here is another question about external entities. > An xml document is given below: > > <!DOCTYPE Root [ > <!ENTITY % PE SYSTEM "pent.ent"> > %PE; > ]> > <Root att="&ext;" /> > > The content of file pent.ent is: > > <!ELEMENT Root ANY> > <!ATTLIST Root att NMTOKEN #IMPLIED> > <!ENTITY ext "blah"> > > By definition, PE is an external parameter entity. How about entity ext? > From your last message, it should be an internal ext, right? > > Thanks, > Junfeng -- Eve Maler +1 425 947 4522 Technology Director eve.maler @ sun.com CTO Business Alliances group Sun Microsystems, Inc.Received on Thursday, 7 July 2005 19:49:19 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 30 April 2009 12:12:51 GMT