W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-editor@w3.org > October to December 2004

errata

From: Remeev Valeri <val_remeev@hotPOP.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2004 21:07:27 +0000
Message-ID: <000601c4e933$5a36ef10$3812a8c0@vocomp>
To: <xml-editor@w3.org>
>
>
>Dear Sirs,
>
>ERRATA (possible):
>
>------------------------
>location:
>
>Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0 (Third Edition)
>W3C Recommendation 04 February 2004
>
>Section 4 Physical Structures (Definition of unparsed entity: 3d sentence of definition)
>
>AND THE SAME
>
>Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.1
>W3C Recommendation 04 February 2004, edited in place 15 April 2004
>
>Section   4 Physical Structures     (Definition of unparsed entity: 3d sentence of definition)
>-------------------------
>
>Sentence:
>
>Beyond a requirement that an XML processor make the identifiers for the entity and notation available to the application, XML places no constraints on the contents of unparsed entities.
>
>Planned structure of this sentense:
>
>Beyond  (some constraint on Content), XML places no (another constraints on Contents).
>
>But:
>
>1.    "...identifiers for the entity and notation..." DO NOT constitute part of or whole content of unparsed entity; identifiers ARE external objects relatively content of unparsed entity.
>
>2.    so, "...a requirement that an XML processor make the identifiers for the entity and notation available to the application..." IS NOT constraint on the contents of unparsed entities.
>
>3.    so, whole sentence is semantically incorrect.
>
>
>Best Regards,
>Valeri Remeev
>val_remeev@hotpop.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Thursday, 23 December 2004 22:15:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 5 February 2014 23:39:46 UTC