- From: François Yergeau <francois@yergeau.com>
- Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 15:14:20 -0500
- To: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
- Cc: xml-editor@w3.org
Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu> wrote: >The new third edition of XML inspired me to read through the latest >errata. I have a problem with one of them that I think is a >substantial and unnecessary change to the definition of XML. > >E57 states: [rest elided, see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-editor/2003OctDec/0023.html] The XML Core WG has considered your comment on the XML 1.0 3rd edition PER. We have consensus not to rescind E57, feeling that the E57 status quo is the least evil of the choices. Regards, -- François Yergeau
Received on Wednesday, 28 January 2004 15:15:48 UTC