W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-editor@w3.org > July to September 2002

Re: [xml-dev] version numbers and infosets

From: Karl Waclawek <karl@waclawek.net>
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2002 10:28:39 -0400
Message-ID: <006001c23255$3cd7a690$9e539696@citkwaclaww2k>
To: "Jeff Rafter" <jeffrafter@defined.net>, <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
Cc: <xml-editor@w3.org>

> In terms of error messages it would make much more sense to receive "This
> parser does not support version '1.1'" than to receive a strange character
> error somewhere near the end of a 10 meg file. If for some reason, you
> wanted the 1.0 parser to attempt to parse a 1.1 document, there was already
> a system in place to do this-- leave off the <?xml?> decl.

You may not have control over that.

Also what about documents that are intentionally designed to parse
under XML 1.0 *and* 1.1? Why force a choice on the parser?
I am not sure a change of this requirement is desirable even for XML 1.1.
There is always the possibility to raise an error on the application
level, since the parser will report the version.

> Of course then
> you couldn't specify encoding in the document, but externally it would still
> be possible.
> The de facto usage has been to fail on != 1.0.

Not with Expat, which is in fairly wide use.

Received on Tuesday, 23 July 2002 10:28:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:37:41 UTC