W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-editor@w3.org > July to September 2002

Re: [xml-dev] version numbers and infosets

From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@allette.com.au>
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2002 00:10:05 +1000
Message-ID: <00b001c23252$a52b2350$4bc8a8c0@AlletteSystems.com>
To: <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
Cc: <xml-editor@w3.org>

From: "Elliotte Rusty Harold" <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
 
> This just makes the existing mess of different conformance levels to 
> XML worse. Currently there are three levels of conformance:
> 
> 1. Well-formed
> 2. Well-formed with no optional errors (like ambiguous content models 
> or version="1.1")
> 3. Valid
> 
> You want to add a fourth level, not well-formed but OK. 

Isn't is more like
 
[ WF | WF+extras | valid ][ XML 1.1 | XML 1.0  ][ Namespace 1.0 | Namespace 1.1 ]
 
which is only 12 flavours?

Cheers
Rick Jelliffe

 
Received on Tuesday, 23 July 2002 09:56:46 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:32 GMT