[Fwd: Errors in References of XML 1.0]

These were sent from an address our
systems didn't recognize.

Apologies for the delay in attending to them.


-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/

attached mail follows:

XML 1.0 (second edition) references to ISO/IEC 10646:2000.  However, Part 2 of this 
standard is not referenced.  Only Part 1 is referenced.

Berners-Lee et al in A.2 is no longer necessary, since RFC 2396 is already available.


Cheers,

Makoto

attached mail follows:

Should 

	<termref def="NT-Char">Char</termref>

and 

	<termref def="NT-Nmtokens">Nmtokens</termref> 

in the XML source of the XML recommendation read

	<nt def="NT-Char">Char</nt>

and 
	<nt def="NT-Nmtokens">Nmtokens</nt>

?


-- 
MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given) <EB2M-MRT@asahi-net.or.jp>

attached mail follows:

Consider a document as below:

<!DOCTYPE test [
<!ENTITY % E "]]&gt;">
<!ENTITY % CondSect "&lt;![IGNORE[&E;"?
&CondSect;
<!ELEMENT test EMPTY>
]>
<test></test>

Does "Proper Conditional Section/PE Nesting" make this invalid? 


MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given) <EB2M-MRT@asahi-net.or.jp>

attached mail follows:

Now that ISO/IEC 10646-2:2001 has been published, XML 1.0 should
reference to it.

-- 
MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given) <EB2M-MRT@asahi-net.or.jp>