W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-editor@w3.org > January to March 2002

[Fwd: Errors in References of XML 1.0]

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: 29 Mar 2002 15:36:19 -0600
To: xml-editor@w3.org
Cc: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, MURATA Makoto <EB2M-MRT@asahi-net.or.jp>
Message-Id: <1017437780.13229.94.camel@dirk>
These were sent from an address our
systems didn't recognize.

Apologies for the delay in attending to them.


-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/


attached mail follows:


XML 1.0 (second edition) references to ISO/IEC 10646:2000.  However, Part 2 of this 
standard is not referenced.  Only Part 1 is referenced.

Berners-Lee et al in A.2 is no longer necessary, since RFC 2396 is already available.


Cheers,

Makoto

attached mail follows:


Should 

	<termref def="NT-Char">Char</termref>

and 

	<termref def="NT-Nmtokens">Nmtokens</termref> 

in the XML source of the XML recommendation read

	<nt def="NT-Char">Char</nt>

and 
	<nt def="NT-Nmtokens">Nmtokens</nt>

?


-- 
MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given) <EB2M-MRT@asahi-net.or.jp>

attached mail follows:


Consider a document as below:

<!DOCTYPE test [
<!ENTITY % E "]]&gt;">
<!ENTITY % CondSect "&lt;![IGNORE[&E;"?
&CondSect;
<!ELEMENT test EMPTY>
]>
<test></test>

Does "Proper Conditional Section/PE Nesting" make this invalid? 


MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given) <EB2M-MRT@asahi-net.or.jp>

attached mail follows:


Now that ISO/IEC 10646-2:2001 has been published, XML 1.0 should
reference to it.

-- 
MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given) <EB2M-MRT@asahi-net.or.jp>
Received on Friday, 29 March 2002 16:36:14 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:31 GMT