W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-editor@w3.org > April to June 2000

Re: Official ISO 639 changes

From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2000 11:44:49 -0700
Message-Id: <3.0.32.20000425114243.014af7b0@pop.intergate.ca>
To: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>, "Unicode List" <unicode@unicode.org>
Cc: xml-dev@xml.org, xml-editor@w3.org
At 01:24 PM 4/25/00 -0400, Elliotte Rusty Harold wrote:
>Has anybody noticed that XML 1.0 requires 2-letter and forbids 
>three-letter language codes? From section 2.1.2 of the XML 1.0 spec:
...
>Production 35 enforces this constraint.
>I think XML needs another erratum here to fix this.

Yes... there was a good reason, but I don't recall what it was; we
looked at the 3-letter options carefully.  I seem to recall a finding
that the ISO process on finalizing the 3-letter version seemed to be 
seriously hung, but this is back in 1997... -Tim
Received on Tuesday, 25 April 2000 14:47:10 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:30 GMT