W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-editor@w3.org > April to June 2000

Re: UTF-16BL/LE,... (was: Re: I18N issues with the XML

From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@gate.sinica.edu.tw>
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2000 03:16:23 +0800 (CST)
To: xml-editor@w3.org
cc: w3c-i18n-ig@w3.org, w3c-xml-core-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.21.0004140309510.10685-100000@gate>
On Thu, 13 Apr 2000, MURATA Makoto wrote:

> When the charset parameter is not available, the XML processor has to 
> examine encoding declarations such that each character in 
> the encoding declarations are represented by two octets.  Then, other 
> encodings such as Extended_UNIX_Code_Fixed_Width_for_Japanese will 
> be allowed.

Of course, EUC fixed is allowed by XML at the moment. The idea, that 
some people may get, that Appendix F somehow defines the encoding
detection routines rather than merely giving a nice start is why
I would prefer, for example, the title of Appendix F to be
"Example of Encoding-Determining Method for XML" or something similar.

And why I think all talk of "this algorthm" should be carefully limited
to something like "this example algorithm". 

Rick Jelliffe
Received on Thursday, 13 April 2000 15:16:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:37:39 UTC