- From: <david@megginson.com>
- Date: Fri, 18 Sep 1998 17:49:01 -0400 (EDT)
- To: w3c-xml-cg@w3.org, xml-editor@w3.org, ij@w3.org
Dan Connolly writes:
> For the XML CG agenda, not urgent...
>
> There are some known bugs[1] in the XML 1.0 spec[2];
> we owe the world an update. I just want to be
> sure the XML CG doesn't forget.
This is an interesting problem -- as with namespaces, we have no group
chartered to do anything with the XML spec. Can the CG approve minor
corrections? What about the plenary?
It looks like there has to be a group with ownership of existing
XML-related specs. Since Joel's Zebra WG is still nameless, perhaps
they could consider calling themselves the "XML-Residual WG" (I've
seriously recommended "XML-Syntax WG", since they're concerned almost
entirely with syntactic issues, especially the subset).
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson david@megginson.com
http://www.megginson.com/
Received on Friday, 18 September 1998 17:45:20 UTC