W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-editor@w3.org > April to June 1998

Re: XML design errors?

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 1998 17:20:14 -0400
Message-ID: <358AD60E.225EFDD0@w3.org>
To: Chris Newman <Chris.Newman@innosoft.com>
CC: C M Sperberg-McQueen <cmsmcq@uic.edu>, xml-editor@w3.org
Chris Newman wrote:
> Because text/enriched went through a public review process in the IETF,
> this problem was identified and eliminated before it was published.  Shame
> that XML lacked a similar public review process.

Hello? XML has been in public review since Nov '97:

Previous versions: 
     http://www.w3.org/TR/WD-xml-961114 
     http://www.w3.org/TR/WD-xml-lang-970331 
     http://www.w3.org/TR/WD-xml-lang-970630 
     http://www.w3.org/TR/WD-xml-970807 
     http://www.w3.org/TR/WD-xml-971117 


For an (incomplete) list of public discussion forums
and archive, please see:
	http://www.w3.org/XML/#discussion

-- 
Dan Connolly
http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Friday, 19 June 1998 17:10:19 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:29 GMT