- From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 23:01:22 -0400
- To: "Pete Wenzel" <pete.wenzel@sun.com>
- Cc: xml-dist-app@w3.org
On 7/11/07, Pete Wenzel <pete.wenzel@sun.com> wrote: > > The 6/27 minutes at > http://www.w3.org/2007/06/27-xmlprotocol-minutes.html > show that the WG agreed to the following text proposed by Anish: > > "For example, when using SOAP/HTTP binding, the 'Accept' HTTP header > value of 'application/xop+xml' in the request message indicates that > the response may be sent using MTOM encoding." > > When this had been discussed previously, I expressed concern, because > the outermost wrapper is, of course, the multipart/related media type, > not application/xop+xml. Fortunately, the HTTP Accept header allows > parameter qualifications, so a value of > > multipart/related; type=application/xop+xml > > should accurately express what is intended. It seems to me that you'd want both, no? I'm assuming that application/xop+xml can be used independently of the multipart MIME solution. Mark. -- Mark Baker. Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. http://www.markbaker.ca Coactus; Web-inspired integration strategies http://www.coactus.com
Received on Thursday, 12 July 2007 03:01:26 UTC