W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > February 2006

Re: Strongly agin the "strongly typed" meps

From: Jean-Jacques Moreau <jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr>
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 09:56:01 +0100
To: Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com>
Cc: David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com>, xml-dist-app@w3.org
Message-id: <43FECA21.1090609@crf.canon.fr>

Hi Chris,

Could you elaborate on your WSDL-MEP thoughts? (although the "modern 
lexicon phrase" probably now also applies to WSDL)

Blog responses also accepted. ;-)

JJ.

Christopher B Ferris wrote:

>
> All,
>
> My comments on Dave's blog post are on my blog, here:
>
>         
> http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/dw_blog_comments.jspa?blog=440&entry=107924 
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Christopher Ferris
> STSM, Emerging e-business Industry Architecture
> email: chrisfer@us.ibm.com
> blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/dw_blog.jspa?blog=440
> phone: +1 508 377 9295
>
> xml-dist-app-request@w3.org wrote on 02/14/2006 08:51:51 PM:
>
> > Strongly typed meps are like putting the cart before the horse.  
> > Looking at the message to figure out the mep to figure out what the
> > receiver should do is harder than looking at the message to figure
> > out what the receiver should do.  
> >  
> > A longer version is at
> > http://www.pacificspirit.
> > 
> com/blog/2006/02/13/message_exchange_patterns_and_flavours_of_oneway_messaging 
>
> >  
> > Cheers,
> > Dave 
Received on Friday, 24 February 2006 08:56:25 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:21 GMT