W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > August 2006

Re: Errata and current status of ed drafts

From: Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 07:53:49 -0400
To: Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com>
Cc: "Xml-Dist-App@W3. Org" <xml-dist-app@w3.org>, xml-dist-app-request@w3.org
Message-ID: <OF1A3ADD37.49CA34DF-ON852571C4.0040929C-852571C4.00415A73@us.ibm.com>
Thanks, Anish

Cheers.

Christopher Ferris
STSM, Software Group Standards Strategy
email: chrisfer@us.ibm.com
blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/dw_blog.jspa?blog=440
phone: +1 508 377 9295

xml-dist-app-request@w3.org wrote on 08/08/2006 02:58:24 AM:

> 
> I took an AI during last week's call to go through the errata and see 
> which ones have been folded into the editors' drafts (was supposed to do 

> this on friday, but could not :-( ).
> 
> I tried to look at issues that affected part 0, part 1, test collection, 

> xop, mtom, rrshb and avoided part 2 (except where noted). The list below 

> covers about half the issues in the errata list.
> 
> I found errata issues against part 0 whose resolutions have not been 
> included in WWW/2000/xp/Group/2/06/LC/. Is this the right place to look 
> for the latest draft of part 0 in CVS? I know this is the right place 
> for part 1, part 2 and test collection. It seems like part 0 does not 
> use the xml/xsl files. Is that correct? Should I make those changes 
> directly in HTML?
> 
> I also found errata issues against the schema whose resolutions have not 

> been included in WWW/2000/xp/Group/2/06/LC/. Is this the right place to 
> look for the latest schema in CVS?
> 
> 
> 2rec -- done (all the specs): fixed copyright notice
> 3rec -- done (part 1)
> 4rec -- done (part 0)
> 5rec -- fixed in the 1st occurance but not in the second occurance of 
> reference for part 0 (part 1)
> 6rec -- done (test collection)
> 7rec -- done (test collection)
> 8rec -- done (test collection)
> 9rec -- done (part 1)
> 12rec -- done (part 1)
> 13rec -- 3rd item not done, rest are done (part 0)
> 15rec -- not done (soap-envelope.xsd schema)
> 16rec -- not done (soap-rpc.xsd schema)
> 17rec -- change of soap11 link and change of status (various specs)
> 18rec -- not done (schema)
> 19rec -- done (test collection)
> 23rec -- done (test collection)
> 24rec -- done (part 0)
> 29rec -- done (RRSHB)
> 30rec -- done (test collection)
> 31rec -- done (part 1)
> 32rec -- not done (part 0)
> 37rec -- done (test collection), should be closed in the issue list
> 38rec -- done (test collection)
> 
> -Anish
> --
> 
> 
Received on Tuesday, 8 August 2006 11:54:17 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:23 GMT