- From: Jacek Kopecky <jacek.kopecky@systinet.com>
- Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 14:16:26 +0200
- To: Martin Gudgin <mgudgin@microsoft.com>
- Cc: XMLP Dist App <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Gudge, does the whitespace stripping rule mean that " abcd" is also in canonical form? Jacek On Mon, 2004-03-29 at 12:24, Martin Gudgin wrote: > Dear XMLPers, > > I took an action on last weeks call to take a look at the proposed > edited recommendation of XML Schema Part 2[1] WRT the base64Binary > type[2]. > > The description of the base64Binary type now contains a BNF and a > canonical lexical form. The canonical lexical form contains no > whitespace characters within the stream of base64 characters. Whitespace > characters at the beginning and/or end of the stream of base64 > characters are stripped due to the whitespace facet of the type having a > value of collapse. Thus any canonical lexical form of base64Binary is > one line of base64 characters. > > I believe that the addition of a canonical lexical form satisfies our > requirements WRT XOP/MTOM. > > Regards > > Gudge > > [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/PER-xmlschema-2-20040318/ > [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/PER-xmlschema-2-20040318/#base64Binary >
Received on Monday, 29 March 2004 07:16:31 UTC