- From: Mark Nottingham <mark.nottingham@bea.com>
- Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 09:32:01 -0500
- To: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>
- Cc: xml-dist-app@w3.org
On Jan 14, 2004, at 9:17 AM, Yves Lafon wrote: > So you mean you want only the headers of the reply and no > interpretation > of them? Yes. > From what I understood before, having a normalized way to say "this is > of > type image/jpeg" instead of knowing all the header form of all > protocol is > something desirable (hence the meta/rawmeta proposal). I could see putting an xmime:content-type attribute on the body element, so that it's compatible with MIFFY content-type hinting. > Also in some case the headers of the request might be used. In that case, the structure could be extended. Right now, the semantic is "this is a MIME entity", which does NOT necessarily have a request. Cheers, -- Mark Nottingham Principal Technologist Office of the CTO BEA Systems
Received on Wednesday, 14 January 2004 09:32:04 UTC