W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > August 2004

RE: Text for Section 3.2 of MTOM

From: Martin Gudgin <mgudgin@microsoft.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 08:01:03 -0700
Message-ID: <DD35CC66F54D8248B6E04232892B633802FF94F5@RED-MSG-43.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Jean-Jacques Moreau" <jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr>
Cc: <xml-dist-app@w3.org>

JJM,

I understand that you are concerned that 'an additional part' might
imply that the relationship between MIME parts and optimized elements is
1 to N, but I think the sentence reads that way. And your reformulation
potentially has the opposite problem; it could be taken to mean that the
relationship between MIME parts and optimized elements is N to 1

I think we should leave it as is for now.

Gudge

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jean-Jacques Moreau [mailto:jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr] 
> Sent: 12 August 2004 00:52
> To: Martin Gudgin
> Cc: xml-dist-app@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Text for Section 3.2 of MTOM
> 
> "with an additional part used to contain the binary representation of 
> each element that was optimized"
> 
> shouldn't this be:
> 
> "with <DEL> additional part<S> used to contain the binary 
> representation 
> of each element that was optimized" ?
> 
> JJ.
> 
> Martin Gudgin wrote:
> 
> >Dear WG Members,
> >
> >The text discussed on todays call can be found in Section 3.2 of[1]
> >
> >Cheers
> >
> >Gudge
> >
> >[1]
> >http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/3/06/Attachments/Optimization
> Mechanism.h
> >tml
> >
> >  
> >
> 
> 
Received on Thursday, 12 August 2004 15:01:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 5 February 2014 22:28:13 UTC