W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > October 2003

Re: Media types handling in WSDL 1.2

From: Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 05:12:31 +0600
Message-ID: <0aa801c3943a$fb933b10$72545ecb@lankabook2>
To: "Marc Hadley" <Marc.Hadley@Sun.COM>, "Jonathan Marsh" <jmarsh@microsoft.com>, "Philippe Le Hegaret" <plh@w3.org>
Cc: <xml-dist-app@w3.org>

I think Jonathan's on vacation .. that may explain his silence.

Speaking in no official capacity for WS-Desc, I believe we will
indeed support the description side of MTOM. Philippe, isn't this
one of the WS-Desc action items you've got on your plate?

I think cross WG support would be great, but we can achieve that
informally too if necessary as there's sufficient overlap IMO.

Sanjiva.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Marc Hadley" <Marc.Hadley@Sun.COM>
To: "Jonathan Marsh" <jmarsh@microsoft.com>; "Philippe Le Hegaret"
<plh@w3.org>
Cc: <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 1:19 AM
Subject: Re: Media types handling in WSDL 1.2


>
> Jonathan, Philippe,
>
> You didn't respond to my previous note below. I've been asked by the
> XMLP WG to try once more to obtain an answer. If you don't respond
> within a week we'll assume your silence means that you do not intend to
> tackle the description side of MTOM in the WSD WG.
>
> Regards,
> Marc.
>
> On Wednesday, Oct 8, 2003, at 16:37 US/Eastern, Marc Hadley wrote:
>
> >
> > Jonathan, Philippe,
> >
> > I have an action from the XMLP WG to follow up on the recent
> > discussions regarding WSD support for attachments. Are you able to
> > confirm that the WSD WG is going to tackle the description side of the
> > MTOM (nee PASWA) work currently underway in the XMLP WG ?
> >
> > Thanks for any information.
> > Marc.
> >
> >
> > On Friday, Sep 26, 2003, at 11:21 US/Eastern, Marc Hadley wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> On Wednesday, Sep 17, 2003, at 14:33 US/Eastern, Philippe Le Hegaret
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, 2003-09-17 at 13:57, Marc Hadley wrote:
> >>>> Does the involvement of the ws-desc WG mean that the XMLP WG can
> >>>> skip
> >>>> working on the description oriented parts of PASWA ?
> >>>
> >>> I certainly don't want to do the work on the XMLP WG :)
> >>
> >> And similarly I don't want to do the work of the ws-desc WG ;-).
> >>
> >>> The reality is: the technical decisions of the WSD WG for embedding
> >>> media types in XML Schema will impact on the work done in the XMLP
> >>> WG.
> >>> Since the reverse is true, both WGs need to be aware of their work
> >>> and
> >>> make sure we coordinate on it and reach the same conclusions.
> >>>
> >> I agree and +1 Mark's comment[1] that I think we need a cross WG task
> >> force of some kind.
> >>
> >> Marc.
> >>
> >> [1] http://www.w3.org/mid/09D54A43-E944-11D7-9930-00039396E15A@bea.com
> >>
> >> --
> >> Marc Hadley <marc.hadley@sun.com>
> >> Web Technologies and Standards, Sun Microsystems.
> >>
> >>
> > --
> > Marc Hadley <marc.hadley@sun.com>
> > Web Technologies and Standards, Sun Microsystems.
> >
> >
> --
> Marc Hadley <marc.hadley@sun.com>
> Web Technologies and Standards, Sun Microsystems.
Received on Thursday, 16 October 2003 19:13:18 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:15 GMT