One solution to this would be to leave part 1 unchanged and update the SOAP message normalization note[1], adding removal of empty Header elements to the algorithm. Marc. [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/NOTE-soap12-n11n-20030328/ On Friday, May 16, 2003, at 07:37 US/Eastern, Rich Salz wrote: > >> I hesitate to say this, but I think this probably needs to be raised >> as >> a PR issue. > > I think that's highly preferrable to immediately issuing an errata. > > On the other hand, it's clearly an editorial-level change. Well, > "clearly" if the WG has consensus around your previous note. :) > /r$ > > -- > Rich Salz Chief Security Architect > DataPower Technology http://www.datapower.com > XS40 XML Security Gateway > http://www.datapower.com/products/xs40.html > > -- Marc Hadley <marc.hadley@sun.com> Web Technologies and Standards, Sun Microsystems.Received on Friday, 16 May 2003 09:51:38 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:41:56 GMT