My mail was meant strictly as a complement. The first primer I read made me very sad, as it propagated a bunch of stuff that isn't really there. This one is clean, to the point, and in my mind tells a wonderful story around a very wonderful protocol. Thanks so much for taking the time to make this great. DB > -----Original Message----- > From: Nilo Mitra (EUS) [mailto:Nilo.Mitra@am1.ericsson.se] > Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2003 2:45 PM > To: Don Box; xml-dist-app@w3.org > > Hi Don: > Please see inlined response. > > > From: Don Box [mailto:dbox@microsoft.com] > > <snip> > > > In reading section 2.2 (and 2.2.1), the prose is so close to > > perfect, but there's something about it that I wonder about. > > Thanks. (I assume this is a compliment ;-)) > > > > > The section uses the term "XML document" to refer to the > > body content of an envelope. > > > > <snip> > > > Perhaps the primer could use the term "XML-based content" > > instead of XML document? > > OK. There are three occurences of the phrase "XML document" in the > referenced sections, > and in each case your proposed suggestion fits well. I'll make the changes > in the next > version. > > Thanks for reading the Primer - again. > > > > > DB > > > > Nilo > > Nilo Mitra > Ericsson, Inc. > phone: + 1 212 843 8451 > mobile: +1 516 476 7427 > nilo.mitra@ericsson.comReceived on Tuesday, 13 May 2003 17:53:04 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:41:56 GMT