Re: SOAP MIME Type

Mark,

Thanks.

More comments inline:

On Friday, May 9, 2003, at 20:21 US/Eastern, Mark Nottingham wrote:
>
<snip/>
> One important question that's bound to come up is whether to enable 
> this
> for just XML languages, or all formats; i.e., whether it's desirable to
> come up with a URI-based typing system for the Web. My inclination is 
> to
> limit it to XML; although the registration process for media types can 
> be
> onerous (and there are signs that it's improving, BTW), it does serve a
> purpose. I don't think the community would be served well by an 
> explosion
> of formats if there weren't a common thread (such as XML) that runs
> through them.
>

I agree XML only.

> Another issue is that which Don brings up; how to identify a specific
> format. My inclination is to only use a URI, as URIs are first-class
> identifiers on the Web, and anything worth identifying should have a 
> URI.
> That having been said, there's no regular way to turn a QName into a 
> URI
> [1], which I think is what Don wants to do. So, in the meantime, we 
> could
> do something like
>  XML-Dialect: "http://example.com/foo.xsd"; localname="Bar"
> making the localname parameter optional, so that we can drop it once 
> the
> QName mapping issue is solved to everyone's satisfaction.
>

This would certainly be sufficient for our requirements.

> This also has bearing on TAG issue 9 [2], and should be considered in 
> that
> context.
>
> I'll endeavor to put together a first draft and circulate it ASAP.
>

Thanks again for your help with this - I will circulate this proposal 
within Liberty as a potential solution to our problem.

- JohnK
________________________________
John Kemp / john.kemp@earthlink.net
(+1) 413.458.9053    /    frumioj@AOL
Coordinating Editor   /   Project Liberty